I don't know, I'm actually more willing to forgive foot-in-mouth than trolling. Some people just can't deal with interviews. But I find it hilarious how he's always coming up with some new shit when asked about Sherlock's sexuality. I mean, the way Scandal was written, the whole point was that Sherlock wasn't attracted to Irene (in *that* way, I might add). And now he tells people that Sherlock was ruthlessly suppressing his lustful desires in that lovely scene by the fireplace? And that, being able to do that, he can't be gay, because with all that self-control he couldn't keep his hands from John? (I mean, yeah, it's John, that temptation could break the strongest, but really?)
Re: ambiguity my ass